Digital risk · Monadnock Cyber — Intelligence and Analysis
Four services, one method. Each starts with a stated requirement, collects against it from outside your perimeter, and ends in a written assessment that names the risk and the decision it forces. What changes is the subject: a person and their household, a company at a point in time, or a company and its suppliers watched continuously.
The digital footprint of a named person and the people around them, assembled the way an adversary would assemble it: data brokers and people-search sites, breach and credential exposure, property and permit records, court and licensing filings, social and travel patterns, doxxing and threat chatter. You get what is out there, what a stranger can build from it, and the order in which it comes down.
Removal is part of the work, not a separate upsell. So is the part most reports skip — what cannot be removed, and what to do about that instead.
What your company looks like from the outside, and what that exposure is worth to someone who wants in. Internet-facing infrastructure and attack surface, credentials already circulating, brand and domain abuse, leak-site and criminal-market mentions, third-party names that appear where they should not, and the adversaries with a reason to be interested in your sector.
It ends where a report should: a risk register you can carry into a budget conversation — each risk named, scored against your own tolerance, with the priority intelligence requirements that follow from it.
The analysis above, made standing — and extended past your own perimeter to the suppliers, vendors and partners whose failure lands on you. Named indicators, declared thresholds, and cyber indications and warning: when a threshold trips, you get the observation, the risk it moves, and the call it forces, inside the window you agreed to at onboarding.
A supplier breach reaches you before the supplier's press release does. That is the whole point of paying for warning rather than for notification.
North Korean operatives hold remote engineering jobs at US companies under stolen identities. They pass background checks, do the work, and send the salary to Pyongyang. This line verifies that remote workers are who they claim to be and work where they claim to work — identity, device, network, behavior and process evidence, graded on a five-level ladder with confidence stated.
How an engagement starts
Stated up front
Not a SOC and not an alert queue. No agents installed, no tooling administered in your environment, no access to your production systems. No software resold and no cut of what you buy — you license in your own name. This does not replace an MSSP for security operations or an MSP for running IT. It is the layer neither of them sells: someone whose job is to know what is coming, and to say so in writing, under a name.
Direct
Next step
You will leave the call with the requirements worth collecting against, whether or not you hire anybody to do it. If the free self-assessment is the right place to start instead, it takes twenty minutes and you keep the scored result either way.